DealLens · Marketlogic Investors

A scrollytelling investment memo.

Fourteen chapters across five acts — from customer truth to capital decision.

01 · Act I · Why

The Customer

Who exactly buys, why now, and what they would pay if the product simply existed. We anchor the entire memo to a single ICP and a job-to-be-done.

ICPmid-market head of finance, 200–2,000 FTEJTBDclose month-end faster than the calendar can punish meWTP~$24k/yr at the seat-of-pants stage
Insight — willingness-to-pay tracks pain frequency, not company size. [autoresearch:cust-001]
02 · Act I · Why

The Problem

Quantify the pain in dollars, hours, or incidents. The status quo is the real competitor.

status_quo_cost = hours_lost × fully_loaded_rate + error_rate × incident_cost
Status-quo cost for the ICP averages $1.2M/yr. [autoresearch:prob-014]
03 · Act I · Why

The Solution

The wedge: the one defensible insight the team has that the rest of the market does not.

Annotated product flow lives here — input → inference → audit-ready output, with one human checkpoint.
04 · Act II · What

The Company

Founding story, thesis pin, stage, ask. Two lines, no fluff.

Stage: Series A · Ask: $12M at $60M post · Use of funds: GTM (60%), R&D (30%), G&A (10%).
05 · Act II · What

The Market

TAM/SAM/SOM with sourced numbers, segmentation, growth rate.

TAM $48B · SAM $9.2B · SOM $640M · CAGR 17%
Segmentation: 62% mid-market, 28% enterprise, 10% upper SMB. [autoresearch:mkt-022]
06 · Act II · What

The Competition

Direct, indirect, and substitutes (including the spreadsheet).

2×2 positioning: depth-of-automation × audit-readiness. The wedge sits in the upper-right quadrant; legacy ERP add-ons sit lower-left.
07 · Act III · Who

The Team

Seven-axis radar: domain fit, prior exits, technical depth, GTM, grit, coachability, equity alignment.

domain_fit █████ 5/5 prior_exits ████· 4/5 technical_depth █████ 5/5 gtm ███·· 3/5 grit ████· 4/5 coachability ████· 4/5 equity_alignment █████ 5/5
08 · Act IV · How

The Traction

ARR, retention, NDR, burn multiple, payback.

ARR $4.6M (+138% YoY) NDR 128% GRR 94% BurnMx 0.9 Payback 11 mo
09 · Act IV · How

The Moat

Layered defensibility — data, network, regulatory, brand, switching cost.

Strongest layer: proprietary labeled audit data accumulated since 2023.
10 · Act IV · How

The Macro

Rates, inflation, capital flows, sector cycle.

Fed funds 4.50% (FRED, 2026-04) CPI YoY 2.7% (BLS) VC dry powder $312B (PitchBook 2026Q1)
Rate cuts expected H2 2026 — mid-market software multiples directionally compressed but stabilizing. [autoresearch:macro-007]
11 · Act IV · How

The Micro

Unit economics derived from the data room, formulas locked.

CAC $14,200 LTV $186,000 LTV/CAC 13.1× GM% 82% Payback 11 mo
12 · Act IV · How

The Geopolitics

Supply chain, sanctions, data residency, tariffs.

No OFAC/EU exposure. Data residency: US-East primary, EU-West for GDPR cohort. Tariff exposure: nil (pure SaaS).
13 · Act V · So-what

The Risks

Heatmap across market, team, tech, regulatory, financial, exit.

market ●●○○○ low team ●●○○○ low tech ●●●○○ med regulatory ●●○○○ low financial ●●●○○ med exit ●●●○○ med
14 · Act V · So-what

The Verdict

Composite score and recommendation.

Score 8.2 / 10 · Recommendation: INVEST
Lead the round at proposed terms; reserve 1.5× for follow-on.